The Great Indian Political Drama - 3 (Oct 2018 - )

The Archive forum serves as a repository for topics that have been closed from the other forums. They serve as a database for future reference.
chetak
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2039
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 5:08 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: The Great Indian Political Drama - 3 (Oct 2018 - )

Post by chetak » Wed Jul 17, 2019 12:31 pm

Muns wrote:
Sun Jul 14, 2019 9:45 pm
https://swarajyamag.com/politics/goa-go ... h-impunity

A powerful article above on these 10 Congress MLA'S joining the BJP. Many of them unfortunately have quite concerning corrupt cases against them. This includes Babush Monserrat Apparently someone who has great money power and accused of buying and raping a 15 year old girl. Partly this is really thrown a lot of karyakartas in Goa into disappointment. Not sure how this will really affect future polls as well. If they are any corruption cases Then I hope they continue to be Investigated. Also, I'm not really sure how it holds for BJP and its Hindu Bastion in Goa.....how many of these MLA's are Christian??

maybe, this was their strategy all along, to hobble the BJP and keep it under control.

If they get just 3-4 more MLAs from the BJP to join them, they can do a 2/3 split and gobble up the BJP's MANDATE IN GOA.





For first time in Goa, 15 Catholic MLAs in BJP



For first time in Goa, 15 Catholic MLAs in BJP


Out of 27 BJP MLAs, 15 are Catholics.



A political observer said with the increase in Catholic MLAs in BJP, the party will have to change its style of functionining so that the Catholic MLAs are not left feeling insecure.

chetak
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2039
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 5:08 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: The Great Indian Political Drama - 3 (Oct 2018 - )

Post by chetak » Wed Jul 17, 2019 12:39 pm

the congis are really unravelling in a spectacular fashion and publicly too.

many other congi presstitutes and familia toadies will be reevaluating their options in the coming days.


trouble in paradise




Kapil Sibal claims Barkha Dutt was sacked before her tweets, won’t be paid anymore, Barkha says Sibal is lying






Kapil Sibal claims Barkha Dutt was sacked before her tweets, won’t be paid anymore, Barkha says Sibal is lying


The Sibals, who are promoters of Tiranga TV have claimed that Barkha was fired on 13th July on 'disciplinary grounds' after she 'levelled serious allegations' against them.


Senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal has claimed that senior journalist Barkha Dutt was sacked from Tiranga TV on 13th July two days before her sensational tweets on the Sibals. The Sibals, who are promoters of Tiranga TV have claimed that Barkha was fired on 13th July on ‘disciplinary grounds’ after she ‘levelled serious allegations’ against them. Kapil Sibal has reportedly said that since Dutt’s contract was terminated on 13th July on ‘disciplinary grounds’, she is not entitled to any further compensation.

Promila Sibal, Kapil Sibal’s wife and one of the promoters of the channel, said that Dutt’s contract was for a year and was due to expire in September 2019 and she was not entitled to any compensation beyond that. Dutt, however, had claimed that she was fired for speaking about the internal emails where she compared Sibals with Mallya for not facing the staff and going on a holiday to London instead.

Promila, however, refuted the claims and said that they were in London to ‘celebrate their grandson’s academic success’ and had not fled due to financial reason. She has even denied the allegations that the Sibals would use abusive language for female employees, calling them ‘kutiya’ or ‘bitch’. Calling the allegation ‘frivolous’, Promila said that neither she nor Kapil had met Barkha in last 3-4 months. Kapil Sibal, too, chimed in saying that Barkha wrote the accusation ‘as an afterthought’.

In fact, the Sibals have now put the blame of financial troubles of the channel on Barkha. They claim that they were hesitant to launch the channel but ‘reluctantly decided to go ahead with it’ after Dutt protested saying how many journalists had joined the channel giving up their current jobs. As Barkha had predicted, the Sibals also blamed the newly elected Narendra Modi government for the advertisers to back off. Lack of advertising revenues led to deepening of their financial troubles, they claim.

Barkha, on the other hand, has alleged that Kapil Sibal is ‘lying again’. She has claimed that her contract requires the Sibals to pay her a year’s salary if the channel shuts or terminates before. Dutt says that Sibal’s claims regarding her contract are patently false. “Contract clearly stipulates that if channel shuts before the year or even contract terminated, remaining period of a year to be paid. Sibal lies again,” she tweeted.

Tiranga TV’s sacked employees have been narrating their situation on social media for the last couple of weeks. However, things came out in the open after Barkha Dutt, in a series of tweets on 15th July, revealed how dire the situation with Tiranga TV is. She had confirmed that about 200 employees of the channel were sacked without adequate compensation. She had also revealed that Kapil Sibal and his wife had planned to blame Modi for the crisis at the channel, and added that there was no interference in the channel from the union government. Later that night, bouncers were sent to Tiranga TV’s office to intimidate the protesting employees.

chetak
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2039
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 5:08 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: The Great Indian Political Drama - 3 (Oct 2018 - )

Post by chetak » Wed Jul 17, 2019 3:00 pm

the paki army has put the fear of bajwa into the paki ex CJ of pukiland Tassaduq Hussain Gillani.

seriously wondering if 69 is his age or his predilection.




In Kulbhushan Jadhav case, the only dissenting voice in UN court panel is Pakistan judge



In Kulbhushan Jadhav case, the only dissenting voice in UN court panel is Pakistan judge



The International Court of Justice that ruled in favour of India’s request against the death penalty handed down to Kulbhushan Jadhav and stayed his execution delivered its verdict by a 15:1 majority. The only dissenting voice in the 16-member world court on most counts was ad-hoc judge Tassaduq Hussain Gillani, 69, a former chief justice of Pakistan.

Judge Gillani concurred with his fellow judges on only one point: That the ICJ, variously also referred to as the UN court or world court, has jurisdiction to hear India’s plea against Pakistan over Kulbhushan Jadhav.


On each of the seven other points on which the ICJ ruled, Judge Gillani was consistently the dissenting judge.

1. By a 15:1 majority, ICJ rejected Pakistan’s three objections to the UN court admitting India’s request.

2. By a 15:1 majority, ICJ concluded that Pakistan breached its obligations under the Vienna convention by not informing Mr Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav of his rights to consular access under this pact.


3. By a 15:1 majority, the world court concluded that Pakistan had breached its obligations under the Vienna convention by not informing India about the arrest “without delay”. Pakistan had taken nearly three weeks to inform New Delhi about Kulbhushan Jadhav’s arrest.

4. By a 15:1 majority, the UN court concluded that Pakistan deprived India of the right to communicate with and have access to Mr Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav, to visit him in detention and to arrange for his legal representation. Accordingly, the judges concluded that Pakistan had breached the obligations incumbent upon it under Article 36, paragraph 1 (a) and (c), of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

5. By a 15:1 majority, the ICJ ordered Pakistan “to provide, by the means of its own choosing, effective review and reconsideration of the conviction and sentence of Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav” as reparation for the breach of his rights.

6. By a 15:1 majority, the ICJ directed Pakistan to inform Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav without further delay of his rights and to provide Indian consular officers access to him in accordance with Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

7. By a 15:1 majority, the ICJ declared that “a continued stay of execution constitutes an indispensable condition for the effective review and reconsideration of the conviction and sentence of Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav”

Muns
Forum Moderator
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 6:01 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: The Great Indian Political Drama - 3 (Oct 2018 - )

Post by Muns » Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:19 am

Okay guys I think that this politics thread has gone on for long enough. I hope to make a change where threats especially with regard to politics news and current affairs will go on for 38 pages And then curtailed.
Will be easier to follow. Hopefully a lot of these topics will be then shifted to the archive forum once that is up and running.

Locked